In light of the many challenges and obstacles presented to young people by our current higher education system, the Department of Education has decided to solicit comments on how such a system could be developed and finalized this year. In response to the Department’s request, Young Invincibles filed this comment.
On the heels of passing a recent bipartisan budget deal, Congress has the potential to invest in programs that would greatly help young people. Please find a letter to Congressional leaders detailing Young Invincibles’ appropriations priorities here.
The unnecessarily complicated application for Federal Student Aid is preventing some students from accessing the financial aid they are entitled to or in some cases from going to college all together. Students tell us all the time that the application process can be quite difficult to complete and can put a strain on their families. It doesn’t have to be this way. Click here to read Young Invincibles’ fact sheet on FAFSA simplification.
The United States’ Millennial unemployment rate is roughly 40 percent higher than the national average, despite the fact that many jobs remain unfilled. By helping narrow the skills gap, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) is a big step towards ensuring young people have the training they need to fill the jobs of the 21st century. In response to the law’s proposed rules, Young Invincibles filed these comments.
In response to Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander’s request for input on his Committee staff’s white paper on risk sharing in higher education, Young Invincibles submitted the following comments. We support the goal of aligning and improving federal incentives to elevate institutions’ interest in reducing the burden of student debt and improving access and success.
February 17, 2015
U.S. Department of Education
Attention: National Center for Education Statistics
1990 K Street NW, 8th Floor
Washington, DC 20006
Re: For Public Feedback: A College Ratings Framework
Dear Sir or Madam:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the College Ratings Framework as published on December 19, 2014. As a non-profit research and advocacy organization working toward expanding economic opportunity for young adults, we applaud the Department of Education’s (hereafter “the Department”) work to make institutions of higher learning more accountable to students and families, better able to improve, and more transparent for taxpayers.
We understand and appreciate the difficulty of achieving an ambitious project such as the one that the Department lays out in its framework. Systems within higher education are extremely complex, often to the detriment of students and families. How the Department will assign value to its activities and outcomes speaks to our values and priorities as a nation. We hope that our comments are beneficial to your work and will result in a usable system that benefits students and families, with an emphasis on students from underrepresented communities.
November 4, 2014
Ms. Wendy Macias
U.S. Department of Education
1990 K Street NW, Room 8017
Washington, DC 20006
Re: Docket ID ED-2014-OPE-0124 – Intent to Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
Dear Ms. Macias:
We write in response to the September 3, 2014 Federal Register notice soliciting input on the U.S. Department of Education’s upcoming negotiated rulemaking. Young Invincibles is a national nonprofit dedicated to creating economic opportunity for young adults and amplifying the voices of 18 to 34 year olds on issues like health care, higher education, and jobs. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit comments on the administration’s intent to expand Pay As You Earn (PAYE).
Click the fact sheet to read, “Investing in Young America: What’s In the President’s Budget?”
The NextGen Illinois project is an initiative of Young Invincibles and the Roosevelt Institute | Campus Network, in collaboration with dozens of other Illinois organizations, designed to activate young people to shape a unique policy agenda for the state of Illinois. Young adult voices are frequently overlooked in state-level political conversations, and the NextGen project aims to strengthen the youth voice by elevating shared political priorities.
From June to September of 2014, we met with young people from across Illinois and hosted discussions and town halls on campuses, in classrooms, and in bars to gather policy ideas. Over 700 young people, ages 14 to 34, participated in discussions about Illinois’ biggest policy challenges such as education, jobs, and health care. Participants also tackled important reform questions around political corruption, money in politics, and fair elections.
On September 27, hundreds of NextGen Illinois participants came together at a state convention to vote on some of the best ideas that young people contributed throughout the process and created a cohesive 10-item agenda for Illinois.
Here you will find the resulting agenda, containing the top 10 ideas supported by young people from all over the state. We have included a brief analysis of each policy and information on how you can help move these policies forward.
Department of Commerce
Attn: Jennifer Jessup
Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer
14th and Constitution Avenue N., Room 6616
Washington, DC 20230
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; The American Community Survey
Content Review Results
Dear Ms. Jessup:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the content review results of the American Community Survey (ACS) and the proposed removal of questions. We appreciate the Department of Commerce’s efforts to reduce burden on survey respondents by weighing the benefits and costs of questions included in the survey. The ACS is an important instrument for measuring the economic and social conditions in this country, and soliciting public input on changes is appropriate and necessary.
However, we have concerns over the Department’s assessment of Question No. 12 asking respondents to “print below the specific major(s) of any BACHELOR’S DEGREES this person has received.” We cannot agree that Question No. 12 qualifies as a “low benefit” question. We strongly urge the Department to commit to retaining this question in all future editions of the ACS.